"While strong feelings can create
havoc in reasoning, the lack of awareness of feeling can also be ruinous,
especially in weighing the decisions on which our destiny largely depends; what
career to pursue, whether to stay with a secure job or switch to one that is
riskier but more interesting, whom to date or marry, where to live... Such
decisions cannot be made well through sheer rationality; they require gut
feeling, and the emotional wisdom garnered through past experiences. Formal
logic alone can never work as the basis for deciding whom to marry or trust or
even what job to take; these are realms where reason without feeling is
blind." -Daniel Goleman
Emotional
Intelligence (EI) is not separate from intelligence; just that it combines the
emotions with the intelligence. EI is the ability in us to understand our
emotions and that of others for good relationship and productive actions. An
emotional intelligence minds are self-aware, self-motivated and proactive and
seeks personal development in any challenge without any sense of personal loss.
Emotional Quotient and EI have been much talked about since the 1990’s.If we
are flexible enough and able to accept others for what they are, we possess EI
to certain extent. We will be able to accept our own strengths and weakness and
consciously choose our behavior without becoming impulsive. We can read the
moods of others at any specific time and react suitably.
OUR
EMOTIONS……….
Our
ability to view situations objectively and thus to understand ourselves and other
people depends on balancing and integrating the head and heart. Emotional
intelligence is the ability to sense, understand and effectively apply the
power of emotions, appropriately channeled as a source of energy, creativity
and influence.
Emotions serve as the source of human energy,
authenticity and drive, and can offer us a wellspring of intuitive wisdom. Each
feeling provides us with valuable feedback throughout the day. This feedback
from the heart is what ignites creativity, keeps us honest with ourselves,
guides trusting relationships, and provides the compass for our life and
career. Emotional intelligence requires that we learn to acknowledge and
understand feelings - in ourselves and others - and that we appropriately
respond to them, creatively applying the energy of the emotions to our daily
life, work and relationships. Emotional intelligence is demonstrated by
tolerance, empathy and compassion for others; the ability to verbalize feelings
accurately and with integrity; and the resilience to bounce back from emotional
upsets. It is the ability to be deeply feeling, authentic human being, no
matter what life brings, no matter what challenges and opportunities we face.
Where Do Emotions
Come From?
The word emotion is
a fascinating word. Look at it this way: E-motion, or Energy, put into motion.
That is what our emotions do. They move energy and bring things into motion, or
manifestation. The force behind what we feel is what allows us to create. First
we have our thought, or perception. But it is the emotional energy, the fuel,
that allows something to get created. "I felt so strongly that I just had
to rush out and do it". Therefore, to create in a positive way, we must
generate positive emotions from clear thoughts and perceptions.
Thought triggers emotion. See what kind of thoughts
you are thinking, and what kind of emotion that creates. Tune into how you
feel. Use all your senses to ask if something doesn't feel right or comfortable
in the way you are responding or feeling. If you don't like the emotion you are
feeling, change the thoughts you are thinking that are the reason for you
creating that emotion. Get a new perspective, in other words. Healing comes
from taking responsibility: to realize that it is you - and no-one else - that
creates your thoughts, your feelings, and your action
The reactive
response
The opposite of being response-able is to be 'reactive' - in this case one's response is not conscious and self-aware, it is mechanical, like the trigger of a gun. Rather than being objective in the present, one is subjectively in the past. A situation reminds you of the past and there you go. The thoughts that go through your mind - thoughts from the past - trigger an unpleasant or self-defeating emotional reaction, and result in behavior that is not in your best interest. In other words it is your beliefs and your perspective on things that determine your emotions, which then drive your resulting behavior.
The opposite of being response-able is to be 'reactive' - in this case one's response is not conscious and self-aware, it is mechanical, like the trigger of a gun. Rather than being objective in the present, one is subjectively in the past. A situation reminds you of the past and there you go. The thoughts that go through your mind - thoughts from the past - trigger an unpleasant or self-defeating emotional reaction, and result in behavior that is not in your best interest. In other words it is your beliefs and your perspective on things that determine your emotions, which then drive your resulting behavior.
These thoughts derive from times when they seemed
like the best solution to trying circumstances, and they may be an agreement
with a dominant, authoritative or persuasive force, or derive from the
conclusion to an episode in your life of success or failure. If the original
circumstances were unpleasant and become painful to think about, the
accompanying thoughts, decisions and purposes become suppressed too, but
continue to operate subconsciously.
When brought to light, it is apparent that the
thoughts are affecting current life unnecessarily, as they are usually an
over-generalization, an exaggeration, a negativity or an intolerance that is
irrational. To become responsible again rather than reactive, one needs to
become aware of these thoughts and examine them objectively. And to be
conscious of the present moment, and so act (rather than react) as
circumstances change.
The route to the underlying thoughts and beliefs is
to recognize the situation or circumstance that triggers unwanted feelings and
subsequent behavior, then see what thoughts are driving that reaction. Most
often these are fleeting and subconscious, since they are associated with
painful experiences or because they have long been installed in the mind as
seemingly safe solutions to the situations of life and have therefore become
taken for granted - 'built in' as part of one's identity. Normally you can't
see what you are being - first you need to fully experience, accept and release
the emotion.
Finding the underlying thought pattern is crucial
to resolving the reactivity, and when it is seen in the light of an objective
view this is a great relief, because the past decision - and the beliefs
surrounding it - can normally be changed quite readily. It may mean finding a
new solution to the problem that it has been 'solving' in the mind, but the clearer
view makes this possible.
If the previous solution is used to make one feel
right (or justified if connected with bad actions) and/or to make others wrong
defensively or manipulatively, then some courage is needed to adopt the new,
more rational view. If you have done something wrong in the past, it is best to
be thankful you made that mistake, because it gives you the opportunity now to
learn a valuable lesson.
These principles are common to much of humanistic
psychology, and are also the basis for further transpersonal work. To recap,
the way it works is this:
- The person has a traumatic experience, of pain or loss.
- As a result of the experience, s/he makes a decision or intention for the future, such as "men are selfish bastards, I can't trust them" which becomes part of their belief system.
- Because the incident was painful it is suppressed, and the accompanying decision is identified with, but both remain in the mind and continue to have influence.
- When the incident is restimulated by similar circumstances in the present, the old decision is subconsciously dramatized. The tape replays subconsciously.
- The decision may have been relevant and appropriate to the original circumstances but it is probably not appropriate now - it is therefore irrational and somewhat stupid, i.e. it may contain an assumption or generalization that causes intolerance or negativity.
- The current situation is interpreted according to the restimulated beliefs and considerations, and so the person creates unpleasant emotions (sadness, fear, anger, etc), which then drive the him or her to behave in an inappropriate and self-defeating way; rather than the appropriate and self-empowering way that a rational and objective interpretation would encourage.
The Releasing procedure helps you to re-experience the painful emotion,
to the point that you realize that you actually create the emotion based on
your interpretation of events, and that you are not the emotion, i.e. "I
create the feeling of being angry" rather than "I am angry".
With acceptance of the emotion, so that you can have it or not have it and
still be content, then you can let the emotion go.
For the releasing to be permanent you also need to spot
the underlying irrational thought, assumption, decision or intention, and how
it has been driving your emotions. Now the emotion is cleared it will no longer
be dominating your view of the situation and these thoughts will be exposed.
Upon examination it becomes clear that you can change your mind about this and
see things differently, so will you no longer need to feel upset in similar
circumstances and have new freedom to behave in ways more aligned with your
goals in life.
The shadow self
We each have a belief system full of ideas imprinted by our culture and upbringing, and as the effect of earlier traumatic experiences, and even influences we are born with. They are here with us all the time in the present and effect our view of things and interpretation of events, so that we are not really free to be ourselves, and to know our true selves and our true goals and purposes in life.
We each have a belief system full of ideas imprinted by our culture and upbringing, and as the effect of earlier traumatic experiences, and even influences we are born with. They are here with us all the time in the present and effect our view of things and interpretation of events, so that we are not really free to be ourselves, and to know our true selves and our true goals and purposes in life.
Part of our belief system is conscious and makes up
the personality we knowingly present to the world. Another part is less
conscious and these are beliefs that we suppress because they are uncomfortable
to face - they make up our 'Shadow Self'. It includes aspects of ourself that
we resist - qualities we have that we don't like, things we've done we are ashamed
of, things we've believed that others have told us that are negative
evaluations or invalidations. Accompanying these beliefs are put-downs,
self-invalidations. For example, I found myself feeling afraid on occasions and
judged myself a coward: "I despise this cowardly streak I have."
To help in suppressing painful aspects of the
shadow self, we then use these put-downs against others too, e.g. criticizing
someone because he is cowardly to speak up, to reinforce the suppression of the
belief one has about oneself.
So when you resist, deny or suppress a belief about
yourself, you then reinforce this by projecting the same suppression on others.
I might suppress the belief that I'm not a kind person by criticizing another
for being mean. Ironically, when we realize someone is being kind, this is only
possible because one has recognized that kindness within oneself, otherwise it
would not be real to you.
Men who deny the feminine aspect of themselves
often then criticize other men for being soft or over-sensitive. And women who
through their conditioning suppress their masculine aspects may criticize other
women for being tough or aggressive.
As we become more aware, through practices such as
meditation, self-remembering, applying the releasing method, and in particular
through the in-depth technique of The Insight Project we can let go of these
'Shadow' aspects of our personality, we no longer need them as 'safe
solutions', their lies have been exposed. And the energy we put into anger,
hate, jealousy, guilt, envy and so on is freed up and transmuted to its true
nature, which is our own true nature, love.
Responsibilities yours or mine???
Another's determinism (including their emotional responses) is their responsibility, not yours. This is a hard lesson to learn. If lover promise his love that he will take her to the film, but this turns out not to be possible, she may be upset and angry. It is easy to fall into the trap of taking responsibility for this upset, to feel that he caused it. But it is your girlfriend who causes her own grief, not you. You are responsible for doing what you think is right, according to your ethical judgment. If you do something wrong according to your own ethics, you are responsible for that. You are not responsible for the other person's reactions though, that is their determinism, their freedom.
Another's determinism (including their emotional responses) is their responsibility, not yours. This is a hard lesson to learn. If lover promise his love that he will take her to the film, but this turns out not to be possible, she may be upset and angry. It is easy to fall into the trap of taking responsibility for this upset, to feel that he caused it. But it is your girlfriend who causes her own grief, not you. You are responsible for doing what you think is right, according to your ethical judgment. If you do something wrong according to your own ethics, you are responsible for that. You are not responsible for the other person's reactions though, that is their determinism, their freedom.
If you do something you think is right and someone
gets upset about it, even if you could have predicted that, the upset is
nevertheless that person's responsibility. Sometimes you do something you know
another probably won't like, because it is the right and therefore responsible
thing to do. The other person's reaction is their personal responsibility. You
may decide to withhold an action because of a predicted effect, although that
effect is another's responsibility. Here it is an ethical judgment -
withholding that action, if it is the right thing to do, may be a wrong-doing
in itself.
For example if you were to withhold doing personal
development because your partner has said they do not want you to change in any
way, perhaps because they project their personal fears and insecurities, that
is your choice. But if you consider making a better life for yourself is the
ethical thing to do - for the benefit of yourself and ultimately for others too
- and you tell your partner that and she gets upset, it is your partner who is
responsible for the upset - it is her interpretation of your actions that
creates her own upset, not your action in itself, which is a responsible
action.
You can genuinely love someone whilst nevertheless
doing something they don't like or agree with. You do it because you feel it is
the right thing to do, though you still understand and have empathy for their
different viewpoint (which causes their emotional reaction, part of their
'case' which they have created by their own choices and belief system).
If one only did things others can easily accept
then the status quo would never progress. That would truly be a trap. The
solution here is better communication, leading to increased understanding of
each other's viewpoint, and therefore acceptance of the differing personal
realities.
There is strong cultural conditioning to feel sad,
guilty, etc. for painful emotions that our actions, however well meant, may
cause to others. In society there's a general misconception that you are your
emotions. "I am angry" and "you make me angry". This is
conditioning not truth. In terms of cause and effect, it's a viewpoint at effect.
Some say that to be happy only do what others can easily experience - it's the
same lie.
The Church teaches "Do unto others as you'd
have them do unto you". This is evidently true, as if you are being
ethical then it's going to be OK for others to do the same to you. And if it
isn't then you'd better re-think whether you are indeed doing the right thing.
It is one definition of a 'wrong' action: that which you would not like another
to do to you.
It's a basic principle of respect for others (as one would wish for oneself)
that they are responsible for their actions and reactions - that is their
freedom of choice. They are not a slave or puppet.
From your interpretation of reality you make
decisions and your decisions and choices and emotional tone have enormous
influence on the direction of your life and what happens.
Looking
at life and relationships in terms of Communication, Understanding and Empathy
(CUE) is a spiritual viewpoint. It is like the 'love of God' - it can seem
harsh but it's about the 'greatest good'. It has no room for the 'victim'
identification, jealousy and those kinds of very human responses, which are
based on conditioned lies.
Consideration for the other person comes into play when you judge ethics, what
is best overall, not just for oneself. However the other may not agree with
your judgment nor like it. That is an aspect of the unknown and randomness of
the game of life. You try to make it a win-win rather than competitive game by
increasing the qualities of CUE.
You are responsible for your choices,
decisions and actions. For being true to your judgment. For communicating with
honesty and integrity, developing and maintaining an open mind, and promoting
understanding and empathy. For never compromising your freedoms and rights nor
trampling on another's. For always acting from the primary motivation of love.
That's all and quite enough.
Balancing
Emotional And Intellectual Intelligences
When managers think of
emotion, they often focus on overreaction that they have witnessed in the
workplace-conflicts, hurt feelings, or even their own embarrassing moments.
Letting emotions overpower our intellect is not what we mean by emotional
intelligence; in fact, quite the opposite is true: out of control emotions are
not what we want, at work or elsewhere.
On the other hand, listening only to our
rational, factual side in not emotional intelligence, either.Fellings,
instincts and intuitions gained through experience are vital sources of
information about world around us. We operate only the half the information we
need to make valid decisions when we try to use only rational, cognitively
derived data. This approach does not lead to overall success within any
organization or to satisfying personal life.
Psychologists quantify the rational
thinking part of our brains we call it IQ. Psychologists and educators do not
agree on exactly how to measure it nor what number really mean. Nonetheless, we
have some widely used and accepted measures of intelligence: An IQ of 120 tells
us something about persons general ability, as does an IQ of 85.However, the
intelligence does not correlate highly with success on the job. Based on recent
studies experts now believe that only 25% of IQ contributes to one’s over all
success. So, if its not just IQ for success then what else it could be???case
studies and longitudinal studies by highly regarded leaders give us a clue:
opportunity adds a few percentage
points, but many well-respected leaders create their own opportunities. They
are able to do so because they rank high on all dimensions of Emotional
intelligence.
It is EQ that allows us to express
preferences in decision-making, passionately pursue a goal, control our temper
and offer persuasive arguments’ for or against an idea. EQ explains why we like
certain people better than others and helps us get along with the ones we
don’t. It is EQ that helps us to build relationships and helps us to think
clearly when things goes wrong. Real leaders are those who actively inspire and
motivate others, create teamwork and achieve outstanding results; they model
the behavior they want to see in their employees. Emotional Intelligence can
move management to leadership and make the people at the top sit up and take
notice of your contributions to the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment